Want to Defame Someone and be FOREVER Immune to Any Legal Action? Try looking deep at Obsidian v. Cox for some Tips, I Call it the David Aman Tonkon Torp Defamation Immunity.

NOTICE: This post is not Meant to Defame poor ol' Mr. Aman or Tonkon Torp, it is simply to poke fun at the system, and to get you, the reader to think about this stuff. Please find your OWN "Facts" and do not rely on anything I say as being actual "Fact".

Ok, So want to Defame Someone, maybe even rile up hatred against them... well use what I call the David Aman, Tonkon Torp LLP way.  See you make up stuff about someone, you lie about their intentions, you excuse them of extortion and all kinds of bad behavior.  Such as David Aman, Attorney for Plaintiff did to me, And you never have to prove actual malice or any other law.  See, in Obsidian V. Cox, David Aman Plaintiff for the Attorney filed a frivolous 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit against a blogger.  And though Plaintiff never EVER asked for a retraction or even a change of that post, still Plaintiff sues blogger Crystal L. Cox, me for 10 Million Dollars.

In this filing, Plaintiff Obsidian Finance Group accused Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox of crimes, of fraud, of personal gain and all kinds of false, defamatory, and even inflammatory to the public information, based on no real fact.  Turns out in a complaint you can say whatever you like, then it is a federal filing.

One that is picked up by the Blogsphere.

Once this case is filed, and no matter what the Complaint or internal documents say, well its now public domain and is immune from lawsuits.  My counter claim included accusations that this case defamed me, and the judge in this case quoted this law as the reason is because it is a judicial proceeding therefore there is Absolute Privilege in the information that is on the Internet regarding it..

This is the Case that the Judge in this Case Quoted to deny my defamation counter claim.

"" Wallulis v. Dymowski, 323 Or. 337, 348, 918 P.2d 755, 761 (1996) (statements made in judicial proceedings are absolutely privileged); Wollam v. Brandt, 154 Or. App. 156, 162 n.5, 961 P.2d 219, 222 n. 5 (1998) (absolute privilege applies not only to defamation action, but "to any tort action based on statements made in connection with a judicial proceeding").  ""

So no matter what is said, or it's truth or not, bloggers, reporters and others pick up this information that folks like David Aman, Tonkon Torp attorney for the Plaintiff in Obsidian v. Cox, say - AND next thing you KNOW it is all over the internet with absolute immunity under absolute privilege. Which in my case is really a double standard as the blog post I am on trial for is also based on a judicial proceeding. So interested in Defamation Law, Absolute Immunity in "Absolute Privilege" is sure something to think about. So instead of blogging, it seems you file a federal court case talking about all you want in your blog, and then the courts let these documents out to bloggers for you and wa la, trash talk about you, accusations of illegal and despicable behavior with no base in truth and you are, as David Aman, Plaintiff for Attorney, Forever Immune.